Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is just a bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus's general score of 82.6. The Galaxy A51 5G body is just a little lighter and just a bit thinner than the Moto G 5G Plus, even when both of them were only released 2 months apart. The Moto G 5G Plus and Galaxy A51 5G feature very similar screens, although the Moto G 5G Plus also has a little bit bigger screen, a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen and a quite better 1080 x 2520px resolution.
Moto G 5G Plus's processing unit is very similar to the Galaxy A51 5G one, and although the Moto G 5G Plus has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Moto G 5G Plus has a camera that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G one, and although the Moto G 5G Plus has a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and videos, they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same resolution camera in the back and the same back camera sensor size.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has 128 GB internal memory. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.