Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto G Power, getting a 90.8 score against 76.1. The Galaxy A51 5G is a thinner and a little lighter phone than the Motorola Moto G Power, even when both were released only 0 months apart. Both devices we are comparing use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a bit better CPU than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A51 5G has a bit better display than Moto G Power, because it has a little bit greater pixel density, a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit larger display.
Galaxy A51 5G features much more memory to install applications and games than Moto G Power, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a superior camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
Motorola Moto G Power has just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G Power, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.