Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G's overall score of 86.2. Galaxy A51 5G is an older device than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, but Samsung made it just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner anyway. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS.
Moto G200 5G features a screen that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's display, because although the Moto G200 5G has a little worse pixel amount per screen inch, it also counts with a quite larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Moto G200 5G features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G200 5G has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.