Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2021-02-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Pastel sky and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the Moto G30's general score of 78.1. The Galaxy A51 5G design is a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Moto G30, even though it was released only 10 months before. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto G30, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has more RAM.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a brighter screen than Moto G30, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a higher pixel density. Galaxy A51 5G has a slightly better camera than Moto G30, because although it has a lot worse 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking images and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a slightly better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G30, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Moto G30 has a little better battery performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.