Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2018-04-19 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 508 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is better than the Moto G6 Plus, getting a score of 90.8 against 77.5. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G body is extremely newer, but just a bit thicker and heavier than the Moto G6 Plus. The Moto G6 Plus features a processing unit that's very similar to Galaxy A51 5G's processing unit, both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM.
The Moto G6 Plus and Samsung Galaxy A51 5G feature incredibly similar displays, because although the Moto G6 Plus has a quite smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A51 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way better battery life than Moto G6 Plus, because it has a 41% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.