Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-29 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 general score. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Although Galaxy A51 5G is noticeably newer than Motorola Moto Z Force, it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier.
Galaxy A51 5G features just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of 2.2 GHz cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. The Moto Z Force features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher number of pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a superior camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy A51 5G counts with better battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Galaxy A51 5G costs more than the Motorola Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.