Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Prism cube black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a 90.8 score against 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G body is extremely newer, but notably thicker and heavier than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher pixels density.
The Galaxy A51 5G has slightly more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy A51 5G takes greater pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video quality, a F2 camera aperture and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a way better 48 MP resolution back camera and a much bigger sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2730mAh.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the Galaxy A51 5G is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.