Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism cube black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, getting a 90.8 score against 76.3. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's construction is newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a bit sharper display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a little bigger screen and a bit greater pixel density. The Galaxy A51 5G has a better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and video in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A51 5G has a much better battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy A51 5G is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.