Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is better than the Motorola One Zoom, having a score of 90.8 against 80. Galaxy A51 5G's construction is just a little lighter and just a bit thinner than the Motorola One Zoom, although both were only released with a couple of months difference. The Galaxy A51 5G has a little faster CPU than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A51 5G has a little bit better screen than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G and Motorola One Zoom count with similar cameras, and although the Motorola One Zoom has a bigger diafragm aperture, they both have the same video definition, the same video frame rates, the same back-facing camera sensor size and a back-facing camera with a 48 megapixels.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Galaxy A51 5G is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.