Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is slightly better than Motorola razr (2020)'s global score of 87. Both phones in this comparison review include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Galaxy A51 5G's design is a little bit thicker but just a little lighter than Motorola razr (2020), and both were only released with a couple months difference.
Motorola razr (2020) has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit bigger screen, a just a bit better pixel number per inch in the display and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Motorola razr (2020)'s camera is very similar to the Galaxy A51 5G one, and although the Motorola razr (2020) has a larger aperture for better photography and video in low light situations, they both have a back facing camera with a 48 mega pixels, the same video frame rates, a 0.5 inches sensor and the same video resolution.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.