Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Prism cube black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the Motorola razr (2022), with a general score of 90.8 against 81.1. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version while Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12 version. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is noticeably older and somewhat thicker than Motorola razr (2022), it's construction is still a little lighter.
The Motorola razr (2022) has a bit better performance than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a larger amount of RAM. Motorola razr (2022) has a bit better display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little lower number of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a bit better camera than Motorola razr (2022), although it has a back-facing camera with lesser MP resolution, a worse video quality and a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light images and video. Galaxy A51 5G has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A51 5G features greater battery life than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 29 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.