Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than OPPO Find X2, getting a 90.8 score against 79.7. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 5G has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Find X2 has Android 10. The Galaxy A51 5G body has the same weight than the OPPO Find X2, but it's a bit thicker.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168, a little bigger display and a higher amount of pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X2, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB.
OPPO Find X2 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a little better battery life than OPPO Find X2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
OPPO Find X2 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the same camera sensor size and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 also has higher 60 fps video frame rate and a larger aperture for better low-light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.