Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, having a global score of 90.8 against 77.7. Despite being the best device in our current comparison, we must note that it is also a somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier device. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 5G has a more recent 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little faster processor than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A51 5G. Both of them have a display with the same size, an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px and the same pixel density.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same video quality, a back facing camera with a 48 megapixels resolution and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a better memory capacity for applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A51 5G has a bit better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.