Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo's 76 general score. Although Galaxy A51 5G is better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, we must note that it's also older, just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. Both phones in our current comparison use the same Android 11 OS.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a much better screen than Galaxy A51 5G. They have a same size screen, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 and the same display pixels density. OPPO Find X3 Neo features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A51 5G has just a bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Neo, although it has a worse 48 MP resolution back camera, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light images and videos. The Galaxy A51 5G features a bigger memory for apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a battery duration that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's battery lifetime.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy A51 5G is also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.