Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than the Galaxy A22's global score of 76.1. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, it must be told that it is also an older, a little thicker and a little bit heavier phone. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version while Galaxy A22 has Android 12.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A22, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, more pixels per screen inch and a little larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A51 5G has a really longer battery life than Galaxy A22.
Galaxy A51 5G has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photos in low light environments, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 48 megapixels resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.