Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, having a 90.8 score against 84.6. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is an older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, but Samsung was able to build it just a little bit lighter and a bit thinner anyway. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The Galaxy A22 5G and Samsung Galaxy A51 5G have incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy A22 5G has a quite worse pixels amount in each screen inch, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger display. Galaxy A51 5G has a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A51 5G has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A51 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photos or video in low-light situations, and they both have a 48 MP resolution back camera, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition.
Galaxy A22 5G has just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.