Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Prism cube black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, having a global score of 90.8 against 79.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is an a lot older and just a little thicker phone than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but Samsung was able to make it somewhat lighter anyway.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a very superior processor than Galaxy A35 5G. Both of them have 8 cores and 6 GB of RAM. The Galaxy A35 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit inferior pixels number per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for taking photographs or videos in low light situations, a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a tinier back camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality and a back facing camera with a worse 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy A51 5G has a much better memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A35 5G features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.