Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is better than the Galaxy A5 (2017), having a general score of 90.8 against 75.8. Galaxy A51 5G's design is noticeably newer, but heavier and a little thicker than the Galaxy A5 (2017). The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A5 (2017) and Galaxy A51 5G feature very similar screens, because although the Galaxy A5 (2017) has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a very superior camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.