Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-29 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Galaxy C7, getting a general score of 90.8 against 77.7. The Galaxy A51 5G construction is much newer than the Galaxy C7's, but it's noticeably thicker and just a little bit heavier. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version while Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy C7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a little larger display and a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A51 5G takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy C7, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution. Galaxy A51 5G has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.