Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is slightly better than Galaxy F62, getting a general score of 90.8 against 88.1. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is older than the Galaxy F62, it's design is lighter and just a little bit thinner. These phones include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a just a little lower quantity of pixels per screen inch, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a little larger screen. The Galaxy F62 counts with a little bit more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a CPU that is very similar to the Galaxy A51 5G one, and although the Galaxy F62 has 4 lesser cpu cores (although they are faster), they both have a 6 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy F62 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F62 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations, a larger sensor and a much better resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy F62 counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 56 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.