Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S10e, having a 90.8 score against 86.3. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy S10e, but it's somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. The Galaxy S10e features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A51 5G. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The Galaxy S10e has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater screen density. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh. Galaxy A51 5G shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has lower video frame rate and a much tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is also by far the cheapest, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.