Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7, with a 90.8 score against 79.5. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's design is extremely newer than Samsung Galaxy S7's, but it's heavier and just a little thicker. The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a brighter screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy A51 5G has much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A51 5G captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photos and a camera with way more megapixels.
Although Galaxy A51 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S7, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.