Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's 85.6 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a better device than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, we must note that it is also older, a bit heavier and notably thicker. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a quite better display density, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a bit larger screen.
The Galaxy A51 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking images or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A51 5G features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.