Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is better than the Sony Xperia Z4v's global score of 78.8. Galaxy A51 5G is a somewhat heavier cellphone than the Sony Xperia Z4v, but they are equally thin. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 5G has a newer 11 version while Sony Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1, counting with some extra features and performance improvements.
The Xperia Z4v features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The Xperia Z4v counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xperia Z4v also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a better camera than Sony Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G has a way better battery life than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy A51 5G is more expensive than the Xperia Z4v, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.