Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2023-05-09 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 SM7475-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 725 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is better than Xiaomi Poco F5's 78.2 global score. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version while Xiaomi Poco F5 has Android 13 version. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G body is much older, a bit thicker and a little heavier than the Xiaomi Poco F5.
The Xiaomi Poco F5 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a just a bit inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Poco F5 also counts with a bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Poco F5, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a bigger storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F5, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Xiaomi Poco F5 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy A51 5G captures better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Poco F5, although it has a lot less MP back-facing camera and a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.