Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | -- |
| Prism cube black | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G's 83.1 overall score. These phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13 version. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a little larger screen, a little bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2710 and a little higher display pixel density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.