Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 15 |
| 2019-12-27 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.07 ounces | -- |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Obsidian and Porcelain |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 2700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 4.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), getting a global score of 85.5 against 76.7. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has an older 11 version while Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 15 version.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a lot better screen than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller display. The Galaxy A51 has a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A51 counts with a much greater processing power than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy A51 shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, they both have a back camera with a 48 mega pixels resolution and the same 3840x2160 video quality.
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 16% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.