Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-27 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3, having a general score of 85.5 against 80. The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a somewhat heavier phone than the Google Pixel 3, but both are equally thin. The Google Pixel 3 counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A51. They have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixel count per inch in the screen. Galaxy A51 counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 takes much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a lot bigger sensor shooting much better quality photographs and videos and a much higher resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A51 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A51, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.