Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-27 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4's 81.9 global score. The Galaxy A51 body is a little bit thinner but a little heavier than Google Pixel 4, and they were released with only 2 months difference. The Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 4 features just a bit better screen than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density. Galaxy A51 has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy A51 takes better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a back camera with much more MP and a much bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality pictures.
Samsung Galaxy A51 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.