Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. These devices use the same Android 11 OS. Galaxy A51 is a just a bit lighter phone than the vivo X70 Pro, but both are equally thin. The vivo X70 Pro and Galaxy A51 both count with quite similar screens, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a just a bit worse pixels density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has just a bit bigger storage capacity for apps and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM.
Vivo X70 Pro has a little better battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity. The vivo X70 Pro features a bit better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a better resolution back-facing camera, faster video frame rate, a bigger aperture to take better photography in low-light situations and a way larger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.