Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-19 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| -- | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Moto G60s, having a score of 91.3 against 79.9. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G60s. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Moto G60s has Android 11, so it provides you a couple nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 5G has just a bit better display than Moto G60s, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixel quantity in each display inch.
The Moto G60s and Galaxy A52 5G count with extremely similar memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both have the same internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G60s, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for taking images or video in low-light environments, they both have a back camera with a 64 mega-pixels resolution, the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition.
Motorola Moto G60s has a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.