Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the vivo X70 Pro, getting a overall score of 91.3 against 78.3. Although it's the best phone in this review, we must note that it is also a just a little thicker and a little bit heavier phone. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11.
The vivo X70 Pro and Galaxy A52 5G both feature incredibly similar displays, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a just a little lower display density, it also counts with a little bit larger display. Galaxy A52 5G features a better memory capacity for apps and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Vivo X70 Pro and Galaxy A52 5G have similar cameras, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a lower video resolution and a back-facing camera with way less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger camera aperture for better low light photos and videos.
The vivo X70 Pro and Galaxy A52 5G feature incredibly similar batteries performance, although the vivo X70 Pro has 4450mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.