Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro has a general score of 93.3, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A52's 90.7 global score. The iPhone 13 Pro design is a little thinner but a little heavier than the Galaxy A52, and both were only released 6 months apart. Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a better processor than Galaxy A52, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), and they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a just a little greater number of pixels in each display inch. Galaxy A52 has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 features a much better battery lifetime than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 45 percent bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy A52 has a way better camera than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photos or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.