Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| 2021-03-17 | 2017-02-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is better than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, having a global score of 90.7 against 76.2. Even though the Galaxy A52 is much newer than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, it is heavier and just a little thicker. Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has a bit smaller display, a quite inferior pixels count per inch of display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels.
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A52 features a little better processing power than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A52 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A52 captures greater videos and photos than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A52, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.