Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is much better than Honor 50 Pro's 77 general score. Galaxy A52 is an a bit thicker and a little heavier device than the Honor 50 Pro. Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Honor 50 Pro has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A52, because it has a slightly better 1236 x 2676 resolution, a bit bigger display and a little more pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy A52 and Honor 50 Pro count with quite similar cameras, because although the Honor 50 Pro has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, it also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
Galaxy A52 counts with a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 features a bit superior battery duration than Honor 50 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.