Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2023-05-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.56 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| -- | Coffee Black and Snow White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SM7450-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 644 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is better than the HTC U23 Pro's 77.8 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 design is a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the HTC U23 Pro, although it was released many years before. Galaxy A52 has a much better hardware performance than HTC U23 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A52 features a bit more vivid display than HTC U23 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density. The Galaxy A52 has a greater memory capacity for applications and games than HTC U23 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The HTC U23 Pro counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A52, because it has a 2 percent larger battery size. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a lot better camera than HTC U23 Pro, although it has a back facing camera with a much worse resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.