Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-03-17 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is better than LG G7 Fit, with a global score of 90.7 against 77. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a notably newer phone than LG G7 Fit, but it's just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Galaxy A52 has a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. Galaxy A52 captures much clearer photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 also has a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations and a back facing camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy A52 counts with a superior memory capacity for apps and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A52 counts with a very superior battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 50% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.