Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-03-17 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than LG G7 ThinQ's 81 overall score. Galaxy A52 is a way newer phone than the LG G7 ThinQ, although it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. LG G7 ThinQ features a sharper display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel number per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy A52 counts with a better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much larger camera sensor and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a slightly better memory to install games and applications than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A52 features a superior battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.