Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Holographic white |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is much better than LG Stylo 6's global score of 76.7. Galaxy A52's body is newer, a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the LG Stylo 6. LG Stylo 6 counts with a display that's very similar to the display in Samsung Galaxy A52, because although the LG Stylo 6 has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a slightly bigger memory for apps and games than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. LG Stylo 6 features a processing unit that's just as good as Galaxy A52's CPU, and although the LG Stylo 6 has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A52 features a little longer battery performance than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Samsung Galaxy A52 captures much better photographs and videos than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality photos and videos, a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lot higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.