Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| -- | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is slightly better than LG V60 ThinQ, having a 90.7 score against 87.6. Samsung Galaxy A52's design is newer, a little bit thinner and lighter than LG V60 ThinQ. The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a screen that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A52's screen, because although the LG V60 ThinQ has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a better camera than LG V60 ThinQ. Both of them have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video definition, a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same back-facing camera sensor size and the same resolution back-facing camera.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.