Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-06-17 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 8.18 ounces |
| -- | Black and Forged Green |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is better than the Motorola Defy (2021), having a 90.7 score against 77.2. Even when the Samsung Galaxy A52 and Motorola Defy (2021) were only released 3 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A52 has a more vivid display than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy A52 also has a better screen density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Galaxy A52 has a little bit better camera than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same back camera sensor size, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot better video definition and a much better 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Galaxy A52 features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. The Motorola Defy (2021) has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.