Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has an overall score of 92.8, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A52's global score of 90.7. Even though the Motorola Edge 20 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A52 were released with only 5 months difference, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro construction is a little bit thinner but also just a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A52.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a little bit better display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit lower screen pixel density, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also counts with a quite larger screen.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A52, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or videos in low light situations, it also counts with a back camera with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy A52 has more storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a battery duration that is just as good as Galaxy A52's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.