Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | Mineral Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge (2022)'s global score of 84.7. Despite being the best in this review, Samsung Galaxy A52's construction is older, somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker than Motorola Edge (2022). The Motorola Edge (2022) has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A52. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Galaxy A52 and the Motorola Edge (2022) count with very similar screens, because although the Motorola Edge (2022) has a little bit worse pixels quantity per inch of screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a quite larger display. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Motorola Edge (2022) has just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh. The Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a way more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.