Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 general score. Although it's the best in this comparison, we must note that it is also older, heavier and a little thicker. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52. Both of them have a same size display, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 and the same quantity of pixels in each inch of display.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a much better storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a bit better camera than Galaxy A52, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less MP, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger back camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
The Galaxy A52 features just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.