Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| -- | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's 80.9 score. Galaxy A52's construction has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but it's a little bit lighter. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a just a little lower pixel density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy A52 has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera, a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.