Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is a bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, having a 90.7 score against 83.4. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A52 is noticeably older than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, it's body is a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit inferior quantity of pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a little bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a greater storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A52, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way worse 50 MP resolution, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 2% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.