Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's overall score of 81.9. Although it's the best device in this review, Samsung Galaxy A52 is an extremely older, just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier device than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixel amount per display inch and a bit higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels.
The Galaxy A52 features a better memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same video frame rate and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a much more MP camera.
Galaxy A52 counts with a little better battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4310mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.