Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro's 86.3 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a older, just a little thicker and a bit heavier device than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Galaxy A52 has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a just a bit inferior number of pixels per inch of display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a quite bigger display. The Galaxy A52 has a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera sensor capturing worse quality photographs and a way tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a better memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's battery duration is just as good as the battery duration in Samsung Galaxy A52.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.