Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| -- | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's general score of 87.1. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A52 is extremely older than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it's design is a little bit thinner and a bit lighter. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a little larger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a much worse resolution back-facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited environments and a lot larger sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A52 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra both count with very similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.