Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| -- | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is better than the Moto G9 Power's score of 78.6. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A52 and Moto G9 Power were released only a few months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. Galaxy A52 counts with a little better performance than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A52 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with way more pixels per inch of screen and a much higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy A52 takes much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same aperture and a 64 mega-pixels resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy A52 features a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A52 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB. Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 33% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.